Hawai`i Museum Association 2013 Annual Meeting Recap

44278_152227098126532_5119781_nBy Heather Diamond

The Hawai`i Museum Association (HMA) held its 2013 Annual Meeting on April 5, 2013 in Honolulu. The meeting was hosted at the Queen Emma Summer Palace, and 34 members attended this afternoon event.

We had a lovely location for our meeting. Hānaiakamalama, or Queen Emma Summer Palace, is a historic landmark and museum located on the Pali Highway in Nuuanu Valley. The site was a summer home and retreat for Queen Emma, her husband King Kamehameha IV, and their son Albert. Siding for the Greek Revival structure was cut in Boston and shipped to Hawai`i where it was assembled in 1848 by John Lewis, a part Hawaiian businessman. In 1860, it was sold to Queen Emma’s uncle who willed it to his niece in 1857. Although she lost her son in 1862 and her husband in 1863, Queen Emma maintained this residence from 1857 until her death in 1885. When the Provisional Government of Hawai`i threatened to build a park on the site, the Summer Palace was purchased by the Daughters of Hawaii and preserved as a historic site.

Prior the Annual Meeting, members had the opportunity to take self-guided tours through the Palace before gathering in a stone meeting hall connected to the Palace by a breezeway. The museum houses an assortment of Victorian, fusion, and Hawaiian artifacts and memorabilia that illustrate the close ties of the Hawaiian monarchs to Great Britain, as well as to Hawaiian tradition. The buildings sit on a hill overlooking a valley, and are surrounded by lawns and foliage. Once there, it is easy to understand why the high chiefs and monarchs of Hawai`i preferred to escape Honolulu’s summer heat for this beautiful, breezy location.

Topics covered during the meeting reflected some of the unique circumstances and challenges faced by museums in Hawai`i, as well as issues common to other regional organizations. Members of HMA are spread out among several islands, so cultivating diversity in the organization includes ensuring that not only the various islands are represented, but also the variety of museums and cultural organizations. Current board members come from Maui, Kaua`i, Hawai`i Island, and Oahu. Travel between islands has recently become more expensive with fewer flights per day, so bringing all of our board members or our membership together for meetings is challenging. For the same geographical reasons, upgrading and maximizing the potential of social media was also an important topic of discussion.

We capitalized on our host location by including an interesting talk by local author and historian Barbara Del Piano about the seminal role The Daughters of Hawai`i played in establishing historic preservation in Hawai`i. Originally started as a small social club whose members could all trace their origins to missionary descent, the Daughters grew to include relatives, friends, and Hawaiian elite. With a primary focus on preserving the history of important sites and correct pronunciation of the Hawaiian language, they installed the first historic plaques in the islands. When they assumed control of Queen Emma Summer Palace in 1917, they established the first historic house museum in the Territory of Hawai`i. Today these “pioneers of historic preservation in Hawai`i are now 1300 strong and manage both Queen Emma Summer Palace and Hulihe`e on the Island of Hawai’i, another retreat for Hawaiian monarchs. They also do charity work.

The meeting was adjourned with a reminder from President Jane Hoffman (from Kilauea Lighthouse on Kaua`i) that we will be starting early to plan a mini-conference at our Annual Meeting next year.

Heather Diamond is the curator at `Iolani Palace as well as adjunct faculty at the University of Hawaii where she teaches Museum Studies and other courses. She received her B.F.A. and M.A. at the University of Houston and her Ph.D. in American Studies from the University of Hawai`i. She is a board member of the Hawai`i Museum Association.

Oregon History Day Restarted!

By: Keni Sturgeon

For those who are not aware, National History Day (NHD) is an academic competition centered on aspects of American history for students in grades 6-12.  Each year, more than 500,000 students nationwide, encouraged by thousands of teachers, participate in the NHD contest. Students (as individuals or groups) choose historical topics related to a theme, conduct primary and secondary research through libraries, archives, museums, oral history interviews and historic sites, analyze and interpret sources and draw conclusions about their topics’ significance in history. Students then present their work in original papers, websites, exhibits, performances or documentaries. Their submissions are entered into competitions in the spring at local and state levels where they are evaluated by professional historians and educators. The program culminates in the Kenneth E. Behring National Contest held in June at the University of Maryland, College Park.

Oregon_Historical_Society_entranceIn Oregon, the Oregon Historical Society (OHS) coordinated our state-wide NHD annually since the 1990s. OHS promoted and developed the program with great success until funding became a problem in 2005. Although a small group of teachers and historians tried to keep Oregon’s NHD program going as a non-profit program, they lacked the organization of an established agency, and Oregon held its last state-wide contest in 2008.

Annie Salinas, 17-yeard old, placed first in her division in the 2011 Kenneth E. Behring National History Day Contest

Annie Salinas, 17-yeard old, placed first in her division in the 2011 Kenneth E. Behring National History Day Contest

Now in 2012, OHS has once again taken the lead on this important program. The institution’s recently hired Education & School Services Manager, Denise Brock, has taken on the leadership role for our state’s NHD. She held a workshop for teachers on Oct 12th about how to get Oregon History Day started in their classrooms, and OHS is very near to attaining a grant for the winners of junior and senior divisions for all categories that will cover transportation to the National Contest. The next step is finding venues for the various regions in the state to have places to compete and then to prepare for the state-wide contest on May 4, 2013. In addition, Denise will need to train judges in each region. She is also informing educators about how they can best use OHS’s research resources (on site and online) to teach their students the thrill of discovering and using primary sources in their projects.

“So, this is exciting! I am a former high school history teacher, so I feel equipped to support teachers in a strong way with the process,” said Denise in a recent email conversation.

Getting set up for the exhibit category at National History Day finals

Getting set up for the exhibit category at National History Day finals

Courtney Lupton-Turner, Talented and Gifted Specialist for K-12 in Jefferson County School District 509J, applauds OHS for retaking the state’s Nation History Day program and has supported the effort though letters to granting agencies. “National History Day is a great fit for Oregon because it provides a unique opportunity for students to participate in a year-long in-depth research experience…. the National History Day program, with its endorsement from the Oregon Historical Society, provides me an outstanding framework within which I could build an enriched strand of instruction for our students…. As our NHD program developed it grew to include school administrators, teachers, parents, community members and local historians who all worked together to promote and participate in the program. I am so grateful that the Oregon Historical Society is once again making National History Day a priority for our students and I fully support their efforts to make this project a reality.”

Last year in Oregon, only two schools competed. As of November 2012, we are up to eleven schools. Hopefully even more will decide to enter. Oregon Historical Society’s leadership for the program not only allows for better promotion and coordination at a state-wide level, it has created a fund to help offset the travel costs for Oregon students selected to participate in the National Contest, who would otherwise not be able to attend. OHS is helping to provide the opportunity for Oregon’s students to have experiences of a lifetime – experiences discovering the exciting world of the past though our state’s museums, archives and historical societies.

 

Keni Sturgeon is the Curator and Museum Director at the Willamette Heritage Center, as well as adjunct faculty at the University of Oklahoma and Linfield College teaching Museum Studies courses. She received her M.A. in Anthropology and Museum Studies from Arizona State University and in now in her 16th year in the museum profession. She is the Past Chair of AAM’s Committee on Audience Research and Evaluation, as well as a former board member of the Oregon Museums Association.

AAM – The (Rebel) Alliance

By: Jill Connors-Joyner and Nik Honeysett

A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far, away, the Rebel Alliance stood bravely against the evil Galactic Empire, never backing down despite overwhelming odds. Formed by a brave few after the Clone Wars, the Rebel Alliance worked in secret for decades to restore democracy to the galaxy. Eventually, armed with the significant firepower and iconic leadership, the Alliance triumphed and everyone went home for tea and medals.

Similarly, a few years ago, in a city far, far away (from Palm Springs, on the East Coast) AAM laid down plans to address the challenges of the known museum universe. A small band of brave few, created the Spark (http://aam-us.org/about-us/who-we-are/strategic-plan), a bold and ambitious plan to rethink how AAM serves the museum field. Based on a set of core beliefs and values, it identifies AAM’s future in a vision statement to “champion the vital role of museums in the 21st century” through the four goals of Excellence, Advocacy, Sustainability and Alignment.

What you are witnessing now are the fruits of that plan culminating in a name change from the American Association of Museums to the American Alliance of Museums and its call to action to Champion Museums and Nurture Excellence. Why the name change? Simply because a new organization requires a new name. The new logo is pretty cool too.

The Alliance really is a new organization and while many things have changed, many of the hallmark programs remain, only now, you have many more ways to get access to standards, programs, networks and resources.

To witness the spoils of this heroic battle against all the odds and what a new AAM means for you, your organization and the museum field, join us, Jill Connors-Joyner and Nik Honeysett, for a free workshop at the WMA meeting, “Excellence in Every Museum: Applying Standards to Your Museum” on Sunday, October 21 at 3:00 P.M.

What is the Continuum of Excellence? What’s changed in AAM’s membership structure? How is the Accreditation process easier? How can AAM help museums pursue and uphold standards and best practices?  How can you use Jedi mind control to effectively communicate the value your museum brings to your community and your audiences?

All these questions and more will be answered at the workshop, so please join us.

 

Jill Connors-Joyner runs the Museum Assessment Program at AAM. Nik Honeysett, Head of Administration at the Getty Museum sits on AAM’s board of directors.

For Those About to Rock…

ImageThere’s been a few OpEd Pieces in the Times about defining elements of generational differences.  Last week’s Old Vs. Young by David Leonhardt. Friedman’s piece on The Rise of Popularism and today’s The Downside of Liberty by Kurt Andersen.

Each of these articles made me proud to be part of a blogging community here seeking a sense of place for (he gringes…) Gen Xers.

I do not want the moniker.  And it seems none of us do.  It’s a definining characteristic even that those in “Gen X” do not like labels, especially the Gen X one.  Still, this is kind of a way to celebrate *US*.  Not U.S.  Not U.S.A.  But “us” — the hard-working, non-profit-minded, culture moles digging trenches around historical legacies, arts integrated educational models, and meaningful collections to safeguard them from the natural tendencies of the free market fire storm.

Jefferson knew it.  We hold these truths to be self-evident.  The fact is that a free-market is not interested in “safeguarding.”  It supports selfishness, in a way, as a prime mover.  Jefferson knew that if he did not give his library to the Library of Congress it would not survive.  A free market would not protect it.

From Carnegie to Ford to Eli Broad and others know that their legacy must be protected by the non-profit model.  Even as there are explorations around whether we are overbuilt, at least as a museum industry.  In the long run, this will work itself out.  Through good work and a focus on truth and hard work by people like us.  We are not-for-profit.  We are proud.  Hard work is the truth part of this equation.

In the Thomas Friedman article referenced above, he quotes Dov Seidman as saying, “The most important part of telling the truth is that it actually binds you to people,” explains Seidman, “because when you trust people with the truth, they trust you back.”  To which he adds, “Trusting people with the truth is like giving them a solid floor.  It compels action. When you are anchored in shared truth, you start to solve problems together. It’s the beginning of coming up with a better path.”

But today, many of us…we do not work.  We rock!  Enjoy the Fourth of July and the “pursuit of happiness…” before you head back in tomorrow, and get back to the hard work we all do together!

And for the hard work you…we…ALL do, we salute you.  And if you are about to rock, well…

 

Originally posted on the blog http://genxsays.wordpress.com/ — WordPress blog site created and managed by Jennifer Caleshu, Director of Earned Revenue and Project Management at Bay Area Discovery Museum.

Creative Placemaking in Southern Arizona

By: Whitney Suzanne Klotz

“It’s About Using the Arts to Make a Place Better”: Creative Placemaking in Southern Arizona

The above was spoken by National Endowment for the Arts Chairman Rocco Landesman during a panel discussion on the topic of creative placemaking.  The discussion was held in February of this year in my city of residence, Tucson, Arizona.  Joining Landesman were three local arts professionals. 

            I became so interested in the topic of creative placemaking that following my attendance of the panel discussion, I conducted individual interviews with each of the local panelists with the intent of sharing my conversations through this blog.  What follows is the most stimulating and museum-relevant content of my interviews.

On February 28, 2012, my afternoon was hijacked by the Arizona State Museum’s Director of Education, Lisa Falk.  With Lisa behind the wheel, we hurriedly made our way into downtown Tucson, all the while munching on Trader Joe’s chocolate mints, a “survival treat” I grabbed in preparation for an afternoon of the unknown.

As it turned out, we ended up in an air-conditioned auditorium for a casual yet intellectual panel discussion on the concept of creative placemaking.  The panelists included a guest of honor, the National Endowment for the Arts Chairman Rocco Landesman and three local arts professionals, namely Maribel Alvarez, University of Arizona (UA) Southwest Studies Center Social Scientist and Program Director of Tucson Meet Yourself, Gail Browne, Executive Director of the University of Arizona Poetry Center, and Bill Mackey, Instructor in the University of Arizona School of Architecture and the creative mind behind Worker, Inc., “a company that specializes in promoting change in the built environment” (Worker, Inc. Web site).

So, what exactly is creative placemaking?  Well, as I learned, creative placemaking has a variety of meanings and applications depending upon who is engaging in it.  Landesman’s definition of creative placemaking gives us a foundation on which to build our understanding:  “Creative placemaking is about how the arts can change and transform places, where the arts can intersect with the real world…It’s about using the arts to make [a] place better” (as shared during February 28 panel discussion).

Mackey, an architect, applies his building and design background in artistic ways that serve to intellectually mobilize the Tucson community.  His unique configuration of interests and skills springs from his passion for understanding how people use space.

Currently, his work involves teaching an Honors undergraduate course in exhibition development.  One such run of the course culminated in You Are Here:  UA and Downtown!, exhibited in the fall of 2011.  First, students explored the City of Tucson through various class readings and then they experienced the practicum portion of the class.  Mackey posed the following question:  “What have you figured out about the city?”  Myriad responses ensued, resulting in an agreed upon unifying exhibition theme:  an exploration of how the University of Arizona community views downtown Tucson.  Through the use of videos, urban checklists, interactive overlay maps, postcards, graphics, and survey results, You are Here:  UA and Downtown! invited visitors to think about the UA and its complex relationship with downtown Tucson.

Mackey is also currently pursuing an independent project (with the help of a few others) entitled Worker Transit Authority.  The project revolves around a mock transit authority, the Worker Transit Authority, and uses it as a point of reference to critically explore how land is used in relation to transportation.  According to Mackey, “Everything you see in a city is based on transportation.  The whole built environment is based on how we move ourselves and goods around.”  Like the Honors undergraduate course, Worker Transit Authority will culminate in an exhibition (on display through the early part of this month) or rather as Mackey describes it, a “planning event.”  The planning event will encourage its attendees to think critically about how they navigate their city – Tucson.  Attendees will be able to sign on to fake city planning committees, meet fake city planning officials, and map out how they, over the course of a week, inhabit Tucson.

Mackey reminds us to do work – create exhibitions, produce programming – that resonates with visitors and how they understand themselves vis-à-vis the here and the now.  We can certainly still develop exhibitions that explore people and places long passed, but we must incorporate into those exhibitions components that place the exhibition content in a contemporary context.  We must create opportunities for visitors to meaningfully connect their being, their sense of self, to the content.

I must admit that I’m not much of a reader, especially of poetry, but after my conversation with Browne, the Executive Director of the University of Arizona Poetry Center, and a tour of the Poetry Center’s facilities, I’m intrigued.  You just might find me musing over a poem in the meditation garden of the Poetry Center or listening, via voca, the Poetry Center’s Audio Video Library, to Lucille Clifton read her “Homage to My Hips” (a poem shared with me by Tony Luebbermann, a most friendly and inspiring individual who serves on the Poetry Center’s Development Committee, as well as acts as a Poetry Center docent).

In 2007, after many years of periodic relocation, the Poetry Center was able to move into its current home, one intended just for it and one that was built with the purpose of facilitating an impressive public outreach calendar.  As Browne states, “The idea of community is so central to where the Poetry Center is now.”  Such an evaluation is certainly true, as the Poetry Center provides year-round public programming that meets the needs of a broad audience.  It is through its programming that the Poetry Center seeks to create what Browne calls a “community of readers.”  These readers engage in Family Days, poetry readings, art exhibitions, lectures, classes, creative writing workshops and Shop Talks – a relaxed program of lecture and peer conversation that allows interested individuals to become familiar with and gain a better understanding of the writings of a poet who will read at the Poetry Center.

The Poetry Center also supports Poetry Out Loud, a national contest for high school students for which contestants memorize and publicly recite poetry.  Additionally, the Poetry Center supports a contest of its own making, namely the annual Corrido Contest.  For this uniquely Southwestern (more specifically borderlands) contest, participants must author a corrido (a Mexican musical ballad form) of his/her own and he/she may do so in either English or Spanish.  Much to Browne’s joy, the popularity of the Corrido Contest has greatly increased over the years, with submissions coming not only from the contest’s city of origin, but from outlying communities like Rio Rico and Nogales.  Browne views the upward swing as evidence of people and their communities taking pride of ownership in the contest.

Browne reminds us to intentionally foster the personal growth (intellectual and otherwise) of our visitors.  What skills and what knowledge do we want our visitors to develop or gain as a result of their engagement with our institutions?  For the Poetry Center, they seek to create a community of readers – individuals interested in and capable of immersing themselves in poetry who gain something from their investment, whether it simply be a moment of relaxation or a more sophisticated understanding of the world in which they live.

Alvarez has a rather unusual and enviable employment arrangement at the University of Arizona, one that allows her to engage in the academic world as a social scientist and university instructor, but also one that allows her to interact with the wider Tucson community as a key staff member of a local community organization.  Alvarez serves as the Program Director for Tucson Meet Yourself, a folklife festival held every year in the Old Pueblo (Tucson).  Tucson Meet Yourself was created using the Smithsonian’s Folklife Festival as its blueprint.  For one long weekend, 65 different ethnic communities, along with folk communities, who call Tucson and the greater Arizona-Sonora region home, share their histories and cultures with the public in an apolitical and celebratory atmosphere.  The festival attendees are, as Alvarez puts it, “willing to contaminate themselves in public spaces and hear different languages, eat different foods, dance to different tunes.”  After nearly 40 years, Tucson Meet Yourself is looking to deepen and widen its cultural preservation impact, with Alvarez taking lead on the responsibility to transition Tucson Meet Yourself from a one-event effort to a year-round series of public programs.

What is particularly intriguing is Alvarez’s approach to this challenge.  For her, understanding and applying the backstory of a place, of a community, to its current existence or formation is fundamental to effectively working within in it and for it.  Such an approach assists her in comprehending varying points-of-view and getting a hold on the overall social makeup of a community.

As she lives and works in Tucson, Alvarez has devoted much time to delving into the desert city’s local and regional histories.  She uses mythologies of the historical West to better understand those histories, defining the mythologies as “elaborate works of the imagination that attach [us] to the land” and that serve as a way to conceptualize a cultural/historical landscape.  Within mythologies, of course, there are people or characters.  Alvarez described several of the characters who reside in the historical West:  the bohemian or the creative spirit who loses (figuratively) him/herself in the open, vast expanse of undefiled nature; the individual who engineers new ways to use the land and its resources (i.e. miners, railroad magnates and workers); and the individual who seeks to regulate society through law and order.  For Alvarez, these various historical characters are still alive today, though they are 21st-century embodiments:  Mackey is the individual intrigued by the interaction between land, space and people, eager to investigate the built world and perhaps as eager to deconstruct it and build anew; Browne is the bohemian, compelled to express herself through poetry even in an environment as intense and unforgiving as the Sonoran Desert; and Alvarez is the folklorist/anthropologist who takes it all in, critically analyzing the various events, processes, and people.

Alvarez reminds us to understand the place and the function of our institutions within their respective communities and within their greater geographic and cultural regions, and to do so by taking a good, long look at our institutions’ local and regional histories.  We must seek to understand the myriad social, political, economic, and environmental factors that were in play and recognize that such factors are still in motion today, though in different forms.

So, to return to creative placemaking and museums:  after much musing over the concept of creative placemaking – what it is and what it means – I believe that museums are actively engaging in it in one form or another on a worldwide basis.  And, I think that the individuals profiled above engage in creative placemaking in ways that remind us of its critical components.  I think their work provides models for us all.

Many thanks to Lisa Falk, hijacker of afternoons, for making me really think about place, culture, people and museums (creative placemaking) and for introducing me to three individuals who all possess an uncommon combination of great intelligence, insight, and energy, and who are applying their nexuses of qualities in ways that are creating a better Tucson.

 

Whitney Suzanne Klotz has worked in the Education office at the Arizona State Museum (ASM) in Tucson, Arizona.  ASM promotes the understanding of the Native peoples of the Southwest and northern Mexico. She holds a bachelor’s degree in anthropology from the University of Arizona and a master’s degree in museum studies from The George Washington University.

 

National Council on Public History – Call for Proposals

Call for Proposals

“Knowing your Public(s)—The Significance of Audiences in Public History”

2013 Annual Meeting, National Council on Public History

Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, April 17-20, 2013

In 2013 the National Council on Public History will meet at the Delta Ottawa City Centre, in the heart of downtown Ottawa, Canada, with Canada’s Parliament buildings, historic ByWard market, national museums and historic sites, river trails, the UNESCO World Heritage Site of the Rideau Canal, and numerous cafes and restaurants within easy walking distance. The program committee invites panel, roundtable, workshop, working group, and individual paper proposals for the conference. The Call for Poster sessions will be issued in fall 2012.

As Canada’s capital, Ottawa is the national centre of the museum, archival and heritage community, and its historical and cultural attractions draw 5 million national and international tourists annually. Ottawa’s two universities have strong connections to public and applied history. The federal government employs many history practitioners and creates a market for private consultants. With so many diverse fields of Public History theory and practice represented, Ottawa is an ideal place to consider issues and ideas associated with the theme of “Knowing your Public(s)—The Significance of Audiences in Public History.”

These could include:

  • the changing nature of the public and the evolution of the discipline over the last forty years;
  • how the public and Public Historians influence each other in the production of history;
  • the effects of changing approaches to public participation, reciprocity, and authority on Public History theory and practice;
  • the impact of digital media on expanding or excluding public engagement;
  • generational differences including Public History for the millennial generation;
  • intersections between Public History practised at universities and in the broader community;
  • issues related to working with ‘closed’ audiences in fields such as litigation, or government-directed, research;
  • access to and use of grey literature
  • the increasing need for audience relevance in times of economic recession;
  • and diverse cultural and multi-national approaches to commemorating events such as the bi-centennial of the War of 1812 or the 60th anniversary of the armistice of the Korean War.

We welcome submissions from all areas of the field, including teaching, museums, archives, heritage management, tourism, consulting, litigation-based research, and public service. Proposals may address any area of Public History, but we especially welcome submissions which relate to our theme. Case studies should evoke broader questions about practice in the field. The program committee prefers complete session proposals but will endeavor to construct sessions from proposals for individual presentations. Sessions are 1.5 hours (working groups may be longer); significant time for audience discussion should be included in every session.

The committee encourages a wide variety of forms of conversation, such as working groups, roundtables, panel sessions, and professional development workshops, and urges participants to dispense with the reading of papers. Participants may be members of only one panel, but may also engage in working groups, introducing sessions and leading discussions.

See the NCPH website at www.ncph.org for details about submitting your proposal and be sure to peruse past NCPH programs for ideas about new session/event formats.

Proposals are due by July 15, 2012.

All presenters and other participants are expected to register for the annual meeting. If you have questions, please contact the program committee co-chairs or the NCPH program director.

2013 Program Committee Co-Chairs

Michelle A. Hamilton                                    Jean-Pierre Morin

Director of Public History                              Treaty Historian

The University of Western Ontario                Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development Canada

mhamilt3@uwo.ca                                         JeanPierre.Morin@aadnc-aandc.gc.ca

NCPH Program Director

Carrie Dowdy

dowdyc@iupui.edu

WMA Member Museum Recipient of Prestigious National Book Award

The America Association of Museums has awarded the Nevada Museum of Art its coveted 2012 Frances Smyth-Ravenel Prize for Excellence in Publication Design for the Museum’s publication Altered Landscape: Photographs of a Changing Environment. This grand prize award is bestowed upon only one museum in the United States each year. The deluxe 288-page publication, published by Skira Rizzoli, New York, highlights more than 150 photographic works, by more than 100 artists, from the Museum’s permanent photography collection of the same name. Past winners of the Frances Smyth-Ravenel Prize for Excellence in Publication Design include the International Center of Photography, NY; the Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum, NY; and the Smithsonian American Art Museum, Washington DC.

“This publication has garnered praise and enthusiasm from writers, artists, critics and art lovers alike. The receipt of AAM’s grand prize further confirms that both the book and collection are powerful and thought-provoking examinations of human impacts on our global environment,” commented David B. Walker, Executive Director | CEO, Nevada Museum of Art. “The Museum is truly honored to be selected for recognition by the AAM and receive this prestigious award.”

A keystone of the Museum’s thematic focus on art and environment, the Altered Landscape: Photographs of a Changing Environment publication examines the many ways that humans interact with natural and built environments. Designed by Brad Bartlett of Brad Bartlett Design, Los Angeles, the book is edited and authored by Ann M. Wolfe, Curator of Exhibitions and Collections at the Nevada Museum of Art, and features essays by Wolfe; Geoff Manaugh, author of BLDGBLOG and Contributing Editor for Wired UK; Lucy Lippard, cultural critic; WJT Mitchell, editor, scholar and theorist of media, visual art, and literature, and Professor of English and Art History, University of Chicago.

“The photographs in the Altered Landscape are drawn from the Museum’s signature permanent collection: the Carol Franc Buck Altered Landscape Photography Collection,” commented Wolfe. “It is gratifying to know that this collection of images— revealing how humans have marked, mined, toured, tested, and developed landscapes over the last fifty years—is recognized by our peers in the museum community as making an important and timely contribution to the discourse on contemporary photography.”

The American Association of Museums has been bringing museums together since 1906, helping to develop standards and best practices, gathering and sharing knowledge, and providing advocacy on issues of concern for the entire museum community. The Nevada Museum of Art is the only accredited art museum in the state of Nevada, recognized for following best practices as outlined by the AAM and committed to continuous institutional improvement and change.